Scientific deep-dive

GLP-1 Drugs, Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Blood Flow to the Foot

A randomized trial found liraglutide raised oxygen reaching the skin of the lower limb, with 89% of the drug group improving against 46% of controls. A 125,150-person cohort recorded amputation in 2.34% of semaglutide users against 5.21%.

By Nora Bissett · Pricing Editor
Editorially reviewed. Not medical advice · How we verify contentLast reviewed
6 min read·2 citations

Among adults who have both type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease, six months of liraglutide raised the oxygen reaching the skin of the lower limb. Eighty-nine percent of the drug group hit a 10% improvement in transcutaneous oxygen pressure, against 46% on conventional risk-factor treatment.[1] That is a mechanism, measured with an instrument. Separately, a cohort of 125,150 people with diabetic foot ulcers found amputation recorded in 2.34% of semaglutide users against 5.21% of non-users. That is an association only, and the study’s authors say plainly that causation cannot be inferred.[2]

The randomized half: oxygen reaching the foot

STARDUST enrolled 55 people in Naples with type 2 diabetes, peripheral artery disease and a transcutaneous oxygen pressure between 30 and 49 mm Hg, the band where perfusion is impaired but the limb is not yet critically threatened. They were randomized to 1.8 mg liraglutide or conventional treatment of cardiovascular risk factors for six months.[1]

STARDUST, 6 months, liraglutide against conventional treatment.[1]
MeasureResult95% CI
Transcutaneous oxygen pressure+11.2 mm Hg8.0 to 14.5 (P < .001)
Reached a 10% rise in TcPo₂89% vs 46%RR 1.91 (1.26–2.90)
6-minute walking distance+25.1 m21.8 to 28.3 (P < .001)
C-reactive protein−0.4 mg/dL−0.7 to −0.07
Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio−119.4 mg/g−195.0 to −43.8

Walking distance is the row a patient would notice most, because it is the one they would feel: twenty-five meters further in six minutes. A far larger semaglutide trial, STRIDE, measured walking distance in 792 people over a year.

STARDUST was open-label, so everyone knew who was getting the drug. That matters less for an oxygen electrode than for a symptom questionnaire, but the six-minute walk is effort-dependent and unblinding can move it. Fifty-five people at a single Italian center is also a small trial.

The observational half: what happened to the feet

A retrospective cohort drew on the TriNetX US research network across 64 healthcare organizations, comparing 6,329 semaglutide users who had a diabetes-related foot ulcer against 118,821 non-users, matched on age, sex, race and ethnicity. Within one year:[2]

One-year outcomes, semaglutide users vs non-users with diabetes-related foot ulcers.[2]
OutcomeSemaglutideNo semaglutide
Amputation2.34%5.21%
Chronic non-healing wound0.75%1.23%
Wound healing complications0.19%0.38%
Wound dehiscence0.26%0.56%
Chronic pain4.44%8.06%
Wound care2.42%4.86%

Similar patterns held out to five years. But this is a records study, and the direction of the confounding is not obvious: people prescribed semaglutide differ from people who are not, in ways a match on age, sex, race and ethnicity does not capture. The people well enough to be started on a weekly injectable may also be the people who were going to keep their foot.

Causation cannot be inferred due to the study’s observational design.
— Lewis et al., Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, 2025

How to hold the two together

A trial that shows a plausible mechanism and a cohort that shows the outcome you would expect from that mechanism is a stronger position than either on its own. It is still not proof. Nobody has run a randomized trial with amputation as the endpoint, which is the study that would settle it, and until somebody does, the fair description is “consistent and unproven”.

None of this is a reason to start a GLP‑1 to treat a foot ulcer. Neither drug is approved for that, ulcer care is wound care, and the people in both studies were being treated for diabetes. If you have an ulcer, the person to talk to is whoever is dressing it. Our page on GLP-1s and your kidneys covers a diabetes complication where this class does have randomized outcome data, and the methodology explains how we weigh a records study against a trial.

Frequently Asked Questions

There is no randomized trial with ulcer healing as its endpoint. A cohort of 125,150 people found lower rates of non-healing wounds, wound complications and amputation among semaglutide users, but its authors state that causation cannot be inferred from an observational design.
STARDUST measured transcutaneous oxygen pressure (oxygen reaching the skin of the lower limb) in 55 adults who had both type 2 diabetes and peripheral artery disease. After six months liraglutide raised it by 11.2 mm Hg against conventional treatment, and 89% of the liraglutide group reached a 10% improvement against 46% of controls.
The cohort study recorded amputation in 2.34% of semaglutide users against 5.21% of non-users within a year. That is an association in records data, not a trial result, and people who get a semaglutide prescription can be unlike non-users in ways the matching could not see.
No GLP-1 is approved for wound healing or peripheral artery disease, and the participants in both studies were being treated for type 2 diabetes. An active foot ulcer is a matter for the clinician managing it.

References

  1. 1.Caruso P, Maiorino MI, Longo M, et al. Liraglutide for Lower Limb Perfusion in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: The STARDUST Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Network Open. 2024. PMID: 38470420.
  2. 2.Lewis JE, Omenge DK, Patterson AR, et al. The impact of semaglutide on wound healing in diabetes related foot ulcer patients: A TriNetX database study Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research. 2025. PMID: 40080656.

GLP-1 Drugs and Suicidal Thoughts: The Warning Came Off in 2026

In February 2026 the Suicidal Behavior and Ideation section was removed from the Wegovy, Zepbound and Saxenda labels, after three large studies looked for a signal and none found one.

7 min read

GLP-1 Drugs and HIV-Associated Lipohypertrophy: The Randomized Evidence

A phase 2b randomized trial found once-weekly semaglutide cut abdominal visceral fat by about 30.6% over 32 weeks in people with HIV-associated lipohypertrophy, alongside a 9.3% fall in psoas muscle volume that did not cost measurable function.

6 min read

GLP-1 Drugs After Spinal Cord Injury: Three People Treated, Two Not

In a controlled case series of five people with chronic spinal cord injury, three on weekly semaglutide lost weight, fat mass and visceral fat over 26 weeks while the two untreated participants gained on every measure.

5 min read

Semaglutide for Alcohol Use Disorder: Read the Placebo Arm

Heavy drinking days fell 41.1 points on semaglutide and 26.4 points on placebo. The drug's effect is the 13.7-point difference, and it is real, significant and a third of the number that will be quoted.

6 min read

GLP-1 Drugs and Addiction: A Huge Signal, and a Trial That Missed

A 524,817-person cohort found fewer new substance use disorders of every kind measured. A randomized trial in people who smoke then missed both its primary endpoints. Both landed in 2026.

7 min read

GLP-1 Drugs for PCOS: Eleven Trials, and Two Analyses That Disagree

No GLP-1 is approved for PCOS anywhere. The randomized evidence is eleven trials: a low-certainty weight effect, better insulin sensitivity than metformin, and reproductive outcomes two meta-analyses grade differently.

8 min read

Where to get semaglutide online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

About this analysis

GLP Watchdog publishes independently. Each seller in our dataset is checked against that seller's own website, and the dataset is updated continuously. Read our full methodology →