Scientific deep-dive

MK-677: A Real Trial in Eight People, and a Liver Report

A 1998 randomized crossover trial found MK-677 reversed diet-induced protein catabolism, moving nitrogen balance from -2.67 to +0.31 g/day. It enrolled eight people and measured a proxy. A 2025 case report describes liver injury after two months of use.

By Nora Bissett · Pricing Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed
5 min read·2 citations

MK‑677 is marketed to people losing weight who are worried about losing muscle, and there is a real trial behind that claim. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, calorically restricted volunteers on MK‑677 moved from negative to positive nitrogen balance while placebo stayed negative — +0.31 against −1.48 g/day, P < 0.01.[1] The trial had eight participants, ran the drug for seven days, and measured a laboratory proxy rather than muscle. A 2025 case report describes liver injury in a healthy man after two months of taking it.[2]

The trial, and what it actually measured

Eight healthy volunteers aged 24 to 39 were calorically restricted to 18 kcal/kg/day for two 14-day periods. In the last seven days of each period they received either oral MK‑677 25 mg once daily or placebo, with a washout of 14 to 21 days between. During the first week — diet alone, no drug — nitrogen losses were essentially identical between the groups, which is a good sign that the design was working.[1]

Mean daily nitrogen balance during the drug week (n = 8, crossover).[1]
Week 1 (diet alone)Week 2 (diet + treatment)
MK-677−2.67 ± 0.40 g/day+0.31 ± 0.21 g/day
Placebo−2.83 ± 0.26 g/day−1.48 ± 0.21 g/day (P < 0.01)

That is a clean result and it should be said plainly: on this endpoint, in this design, the drug did what it was supposed to. Crossing from nitrogen loss into nitrogen retention during a calorie deficit is not nothing.

Nitrogen balance is a proxy, not an outcome. It estimates whether the body is retaining protein. It does not measure muscle mass, muscle size, strength or physical function — the things a person actually wants. And this is eight people over seven days of dosing in 1998. It is a reason to run a bigger study, and nobody appears to have run one that changes the picture.

The liver report

In 2025 clinicians published the case of an otherwise healthy man in his early thirties who developed transaminitis — raised liver enzymes — after taking MK‑677 for two months. Liver function tests returned to normal after he stopped. The authors note that reports of hepatotoxicity with this compound are scarce, while acknowledging its growing popularity as a performance supplement.[2]

One case is one case. It cannot tell you the risk, and this article is not going to imply a rate that nobody has measured. What it does establish is that liver injury is on the list of things that have happened, in a healthy young person, at a dose and duration that is unremarkable for how this compound is used.

The commoner reported effects — edema, increased appetite, muscle pain — are worth knowing too, and the appetite one is worth a moment’s thought if you are taking it alongside a drug whose entire purpose is to reduce appetite.

What it is, and what that means for what you buy

  • MK-677 is a growth hormone secretagogue — an orally active non-peptide that prompts the body to release its own growth hormone. It is not itself a peptide, despite usually being sold alongside them.
  • It is not an approved medicine. It is sold as a research chemical, outside the identity, purity and dose standards that apply to prescription drugs.
  • The muscle-preservation case rests on a 1998 crossover trial in eight people measuring a proxy endpoint.
  • ⚠ Raising growth hormone and IGF-1 has implications that go beyond muscle. Anyone with a history of cancer, or with diabetes, has particular reason to take that to a clinician rather than a forum.

If muscle loss during weight loss is your actual concern, the interventions with real randomized support are covered in what the body-composition studies measured, protein targets and the lab panel and bone density and exercise. Resistance training is the one that keeps appearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

A 1998 randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial in eight calorically restricted volunteers found MK-677 moved nitrogen balance from negative to positive — +0.31 g/day against −1.48 on placebo. Nitrogen balance is a laboratory proxy for protein retention, not a measure of muscle mass, strength or function.
No. It is an orally active non-peptide growth hormone secretagogue that mimics the action of a growth-hormone-releasing peptide. It is usually sold alongside peptides but is a different kind of molecule.
A 2025 case report describes an otherwise healthy man in his early 30s who developed raised liver enzymes after two months of use, which normalized after stopping. That is a single case and cannot tell you the risk, but it establishes that it has happened at ordinary use.
No. MK-677 is not an approved medicine and is sold as a research chemical, which means what you receive carries no guarantee of identity, purity or dose.

References

  1. 1.Murphy MG, Plunkett LM, Gertz BJ, et al. MK-677, an orally active growth hormone secretagogue, reverses diet-induced catabolism The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998. PMID: 9467534.
  2. 2.Cobani E, Amin MS, Hasso M, et al. Hepatotoxicity induced by MK-677 BMJ Case Reports. 2025. PMID: 40675653.

DSIP: A Sleep Peptide Named in 1977, With No Known Receptor

Delta sleep-inducing peptide was isolated in 1977 and named for what researchers hoped it did. A review of the field states the sleep hypothesis is extremely poorly documented and weak, and that no gene, protein or receptor has been isolated.

4 min read

Elamipretide (SS-31): The Phase 3 Trial That Missed Both Endpoints

Elamipretide has what almost no research-use peptide has — a completed pivotal phase 3 trial in 218 people. It missed both primary endpoints, with a six-minute walk difference of -3.2 meters and a p value of 0.69.

5 min read

LL-37: Thousands of Papers, No Human Trials

LL-37 is the body's own cathelicidin and the subject of thousands of papers. Read what they are and it is structural biology, cell culture and mice — including a wound-healing study in diabetic mice. We found no human clinical trial.

5 min read

Melanotan and the Approved Drug It Is Not

An approved melanocortin-1 receptor agonist exists — afamelanotide, for preventing phototoxic pain in erythropoietic protoporphyria, given as a 16 mg implant under supervision. Melanotan sold for cosmetic tanning is not that drug.

5 min read

NAD+ Injections: What the Evidence Shows

A 2026 systematic review screened 113 studies and found no outcomes trials of injected NAD+ for anti-aging or wellness. It is the most common add-on in our 560-seller register, offered by 142 of them.

7 min read

Selank: Real Clinical Trials, One Country, No Replication

Selank was tested against a benzodiazepine in 62 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and reported similar anxiolytic effects. The study is from 2008, published in Russian, and has never been independently replicated.

5 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

6.7

Luvo Health

Moving between compounded and brand without changing seller

8.5

Strut Health

Semaglutide at $99/month, 48% under the register median

8.0

Pallas Health

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names Belmar Pharmacy