Scientific deep-dive

Elamipretide (SS-31): The Phase 3 Trial That Missed Both Endpoints

Elamipretide has what almost no research-use peptide has — a completed pivotal phase 3 trial in 218 people. It missed both primary endpoints, with a six-minute walk difference of -3.2 meters and a p value of 0.69.

By Nora Bissett · Pricing Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed
5 min read·1 citations

Elamipretide, also called SS‑31, is sold to consumers as a mitochondrial peptide on the strength of laboratory findings. It has something almost no research-use peptide has: a completed pivotal phase 3 trial, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled, in 218 people. It missed both of its primary endpoints. The difference in six-minute walk distance was −3.2 meters — on the placebo side of zero — with a p value of 0.69.[1]

What MMPOWER-3 tested

The trial enrolled people with genetically confirmed primary mitochondrial myopathy, a group of inherited disorders that impair mitochondrial energy production and reduce exercise capacity. Participants were randomized one-to-one to 24 weeks of subcutaneous elamipretide at 40 mg/day or placebo. 109 received the drug and 109 the placebo; mean age was 45.6, and 74% had mitochondrial DNA alterations.[1]

The two primary endpoints were distance walked on the six-minute walk test and total fatigue on a symptom assessment built for this condition. Both are the right kind of endpoint — they measure what a person can do and how they feel, not a marker in blood.

MMPOWER-3, baseline to week 24. Neither primary endpoint was met.[1]
Result
Randomized218 (109 elamipretide, 109 placebo)
Baseline six-minute walk336.7 ± 81.2 m
Six-minute walk, drug vs placebo−3.2 m (95% CI −18.7 to 12.3), p = 0.69
Total fatigue scorePrimary endpoint not met
A confidence interval running from −18.7 to 12.3 meters is not a near miss or an underpowered hint. It is a result centered on nothing, in a trial large enough and long enough to have found a real effect on walking distance if one existed at this dose over 24 weeks.

What the trial does and does not settle

It is worth being precise in both directions here, because the temptation is to over-read a negative result as readily as a positive one.

  • What it settles: in genetically confirmed primary mitochondrial myopathy, 40 mg/day of elamipretide for 24 weeks did not improve walking distance or fatigue against placebo.
  • What it does not settle: the trial says nothing directly about weight loss, aging, athletic recovery or general fatigue — none of which it studied, and all of which the compound is marketed for.
  • That gap is not a defense of the marketing. It is the opposite: the one population where mitochondrial function is measurably impaired, and the drug was given its best chance, is where it failed.
  • A mechanism that works in cells is a hypothesis. This is what happens when the hypothesis is tested properly in people.
If a compound cannot improve exercise capacity in people whose mitochondria are demonstrably broken, the case for taking it because you are tired is not a scientific one.

Elamipretide is not an approved medicine and is sold as a research chemical. That places it outside any manufacturing standard applying to prescription drugs — a separate problem from whether it works. Our page on what FDA actually said about BPC-157 covers the regulatory position for research-use peptides generally, and /peptides carries the profiles we do maintain.

Frequently Asked Questions

In the one pivotal phase 3 trial, no. MMPOWER-3 randomized 218 people with genetically confirmed primary mitochondrial myopathy to elamipretide 40 mg/day or placebo for 24 weeks, and the trial did not meet either of its primary endpoints. Six-minute walk distance differed by −3.2 meters, favoring placebo, with a p value of 0.69.
SS-31 is another name for elamipretide, a peptide that concentrates in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Its proposed mechanism concerns mitochondrial energy production, which is why it is marketed for fatigue and aging.
No. MMPOWER-3 studied primary mitochondrial myopathy, an inherited disorder. The trial says nothing directly about weight, aging or athletic recovery — though it is notable that the drug failed in the population where mitochondrial impairment is most clearly established.
It is not an approved medicine and is sold as a research chemical, which places it outside the manufacturing and labeling standards that apply to prescription drugs.

References

  1. 1.Karaa A, Bertini E, Carelli V, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Elamipretide in Individuals With Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy: The MMPOWER-3 Randomized Clinical Trial Neurology. 2023. PMID: 37268435.

DSIP: A Sleep Peptide Named in 1977, With No Known Receptor

Delta sleep-inducing peptide was isolated in 1977 and named for what researchers hoped it did. A review of the field states the sleep hypothesis is extremely poorly documented and weak, and that no gene, protein or receptor has been isolated.

4 min read

LL-37: Thousands of Papers, No Human Trials

LL-37 is the body's own cathelicidin and the subject of thousands of papers. Read what they are and it is structural biology, cell culture and mice — including a wound-healing study in diabetic mice. We found no human clinical trial.

5 min read

Melanotan and the Approved Drug It Is Not

An approved melanocortin-1 receptor agonist exists — afamelanotide, for preventing phototoxic pain in erythropoietic protoporphyria, given as a 16 mg implant under supervision. Melanotan sold for cosmetic tanning is not that drug.

5 min read

MK-677: A Real Trial in Eight People, and a Liver Report

A 1998 randomized crossover trial found MK-677 reversed diet-induced protein catabolism, moving nitrogen balance from -2.67 to +0.31 g/day. It enrolled eight people and measured a proxy. A 2025 case report describes liver injury after two months of use.

5 min read

NAD+ Injections: What the Evidence Shows

A 2026 systematic review screened 113 studies and found no outcomes trials of injected NAD+ for anti-aging or wellness. It is the most common add-on in our 560-seller register, offered by 142 of them.

7 min read

Selank: Real Clinical Trials, One Country, No Replication

Selank was tested against a benzodiazepine in 62 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and reported similar anxiolytic effects. The study is from 2008, published in Russian, and has never been independently replicated.

5 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

7.5

Synergy Rx

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names Belmar Pharmacy

6.8

RxSpan MD

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names Belmar Pharmacy

9.3

Embody

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names RedRock Pharmacy