Scientific deep-dive

Epitalon Dosage and Courses: What the Studies Used and What HHS Allows

No epitalon dose is approved. The few human studies, all from one Russian group, used 10- to 20-day courses, with injected doses in micrograms a day; dosing charts list 5 to 10 mg a day. What HHS's 'intermittent courses' rule means, nasal sprays and side effects.

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed. Not medical advice · How we verify contentLast reviewed
11 min read·11 citations

Part of Peptides: what the evidence shows

No dose of epitalon is approved, and the doses in online dosing charts do not come from studies of epitalon. The published human work is three small regimens from one St. Petersburg research group, each given as a short course: 10 micrograms a day injected into muscle for 10 days in older adults, 5 micrograms per eye a day for 10 days by injection beside the eye in retinitis pigmentosa, and 0.5 mg a day as a spray under the tongue for 20 days in night-shift workers.[3][2] Vendor charts list 5 to 10 mg a day, 500 to 1,000 times the injected daily dose reported in older adults.[2][3] Since October 28, 2026, an interim HHS enforcement policy has covered 503A pharmacy compounding of epitalon acetate only as an injection under the skin or into muscle, “dispensed in intermittent courses.”[1] The policy is not FDA approval, sets no dose and does not say how long a course is.

About this article. Doses here are reported as the published studies used them, with who ran each study, so you can see how thin the record is. They are not a dosing guide. No dose of epitalon has been tested for safety or chosen by comparing doses, and compounding under the HHS policy still requires a prescriber. For the telomere research and the mortality claims, see what the epitalon evidence shows.

What the HHS policy says about epitalon courses

HHS’s interim policy covers six peptides, and epitalon is the only one with a limit on how it is dispensed as well as how it is given. The appendix says enforcement discretion for epitalon acetate “is appropriate subcutaneous or intramuscular injectable dosage forms that are dispensed in intermittent courses.”[1] HHS gave three reasons for including it. The third reads:

“CDER’s safety concerns are mechanistic rather than based on observed harm, the limited controlled human exposure reported no side effects, and the documented regimens are intermittent rather than continuous.”[1]
— HHS, Enforcement Discretion Policy, Appendix B (October 2026)

The concern HHS is answering comes from FDA’s own review. FDA’s reviewers worried that because epitalon switches on telomerase in cells, “continuous exposure to epitalon through the lifespan could enable cells to evade senescence and become cancerous.”[2] HHS’s answer points to the regimens on record, which were all short courses, and the policy holds compounded epitalon to courses as well.

What the policy leaves out matters as much. It does not define a course, a gap between courses or a number of courses a year. It does not name the studies behind “limited controlled human exposure” or “documented regimens.” It sets no dose. Those choices fall to the prescriber who writes the patient-specific prescription the policy requires.[1] The full list of conditions is in our guide to the HHS peptide policy.

The documented regimens: every course in the published record

The published research on epitalon comes almost entirely from Vladimir Khavinson’s St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology and its partners, and most of it is cell work. FDA’s 2026 review found three studies in which the peptide itself was given to humans, two of them in night-shift workers.[2] A 2026 review led by physicians at Johns Hopkins read the full papers, recorded the doses, and noted that the two night-shift reports appear to describe overlapping groups.[3] Together with the animal work, this is the whole set of epitalon regimens on record.

Published epitalon regimens. Human doses for the eye and older-adult studies are as recorded by the 2026 Jain review from the full papers.
StudyWhoRouteDose and courseWhat was measured
Khavinson 2002[4][3]162 adults with retinitis pigmentosa; 46 on usual treatment as controlsInjection beside the eye (parabulbar)5 µg per eye, once a day for 10 daysRetinal function, vision; “positive clinical effect in 90% of the cases”
Korkushko 2007[5][3]Older adults with low melatonin: 15 epitalon, 15 epithalamin, 10 placeboInto muscle0.01 mg (10 µg) a day for 10 days, 0.1 mg per courseNight-time melatonin
Ivko 2020/2021[6][2]40 women aged 40 to 50, mostly night-shift workers, with low melatonin; 20 on epitalon, 20 on placeboSpray under the tongue0.5 mg a day (3 sprays twice daily) for 20 daysMelatonin breakdown product in urine; clock genes
Goncharova 2003[7]Female rhesus monkeysInto muscle10 µg per animal a day for 7 to 10 daysNight-time melatonin
Goncharova 2001, per FDA[2]Female rhesus monkeysInto muscle2 µg/kg a day for 10 daysMelatonin and cortisol
Anisimov 2003[8][2]Female mice, 54 per groupUnder the skin1 µg per mouse a day, 5 days each month, for lifeLife span, tumors
Sibarov 2002[10]Rats, with and without stressNasalNot given in the abstractPineal gland changes

Every human course in the table lasted 10 or 20 days. The only long-term schedule, the mouse life-span study, gave the peptide five days a month, which FDA calculated added up to at most about 22 weeks of exposure over a mouse’s life.[2] This is the record HHS describes as intermittent. None of the human studies used injection under the skin, the route proposed in the nominations to FDA, and FDA said it had found no human safety data for epitalon, “particularly via the proposed subcutaneous route.”[2]

The longer schedules people quote come from a different product. Epithalamin, the cattle pineal-gland extract that epitalon was modeled on, was given in a 2006 study of older heart patients as five 10 mg injections into muscle, three days apart, every six months for three years.[9][3] In monkeys the same group gave epithalamin at 5 mg per animal a day for 10 days.[7] FDA treats epithalamin and epitalon as different substances.[2]

Where the 5 to 10 mg a day in dosing charts comes from

When FDA surveyed clinic and vendor websites for its 2026 review, it found pages saying epitalon is injected under the skin or taken by mouth “with doses ranging from 5 mg to 10 mg per day,” some recommending cycles and one recommending it every four months.[2] Vials were sold at 10, 20, 25 and 50 mg, alongside capsules and an oral spray.[2] The nominations to FDA proposed injections at 10 mg and 3,000 micrograms per milliliter.[2]

Set those numbers beside the studies and the gap is plain. The older-adult study injected 0.01 mg a day, so a 5 to 10 mg daily dose is 500 to 1,000 times larger. A single 10 mg vial holds 100 times the whole 10-day course in that study.[3] The 5 to 10 mg range does match the doses used for epithalamin, the extract, in the Russian and Ukrainian studies.[9][7] No published study links it to epitalon, and no study has compared doses of epitalon to find one that works or one that is safe.[3]

A dosing chart is not a study. If a chart gives milligrams per day, cycle lengths or a reconstitution table for epitalon, it was not taken from a published human trial of epitalon. We do not reproduce those charts, and no dose has been approved.

Why these courses cannot be read as a protocol

A protocol is a dose someone has shown to be reasonably safe and effective for a stated use. The epitalon courses fall short of that on several counts.

  • One group ran nearly all of it. The human studies, and almost all the animal work, come from Khavinson’s institute or close collaborators. No outside team has repeated a human study.[2][3]
  • Each study used one fixed dose. Of the monkey study, FDA noted that the authors “did not assess the dose-response relationship,” and no human study compared doses either. Without that, there is no way to say 10 micrograms is better or worse than 1 or 100.[2][3]
  • Nobody measured what happens to the drug. FDA found no pharmacokinetic data, so nobody knows how much epitalon reaches the blood after an injection or how long it stays there.[2]
  • The outcomes were lab markers. The older-adult and night-shift studies measured melatonin and gene activity. Neither used a validated sleep or disease outcome.[2][3]
  • The routes do not match what is sold. The human regimens used muscle, eye and under-the-tongue routes, and the 2026 review concluded that the mix of species, routes and schedules “prevents reliable determination of an optimal human dosing regimen.”[3]
  • The reporting is thin. The night-shift paper did not say whether it was blinded, and the eye study did not clearly describe randomization or blinding.[2][3] The 2007 study is published in Russian, with an English abstract that gives no dose.[5]

The same problem runs through the other HHS-policy peptides. For MOTS-c, no human dose exists at all (MOTS-c dosage and side effects). The peptide menu review compares how much human testing each one has had.

Epitalon nasal spray: outside the policy and barely studied

The HHS policy covers epitalon acetate only as an injection, under the skin or into muscle.[1] A nasal spray is a different route, so a pharmacy that compounds one gets no protection from the policy. Semax is the only one of the six peptides the policy covers for intranasal use.[1] A separate condition names an FDA 510(k)-cleared syringe as the only delivery device that may be packaged with or contain a compounded product; the policy does not say how that squares with a nasal product.[1] Sellers of “research use only” sprays are outside the policy whatever the route; research-use-only vs compounded peptides explains the difference.

The evidence for a nasal route is one short rat study from the same network, which gave epitalon into the nose of stressed and unstressed rats and reported changes in the pineal gland only under stress. Its abstract gives no dose.[10] The only human spray study used a sublingual spray, held under the tongue, made by a French supplier, at 0.5 mg a day for 20 days.[2] Nobody has published a study of epitalon sprayed into the human nose. For the nasal peptide HHS did cover, see Semax vs Selank.

Epitalon side effects: what is documented and what is not

HHS wrote that the limited controlled human exposure “reported no side effects.”[1] That matches the papers, but the papers were not built to find side effects.

Side-effect information for epitalon by source
SourceWhat it reportsLimit
Eye study, 2002[3]No treatment-related complications or adverse effects describedNot designed as a safety study; randomization and blinding not clearly described
Older-adult study, 2007[5][2]Abstract says the pineal preparations have “no side effects”FDA found no detail on how safety was assessed, or on dose or numbers, in the abstract
Night-shift study, 2020/2021[2][3]No safety data reportedAdverse events not reported systematically
FDA adverse event database[2]No reports through December 8, 2025503A compounders generally do not file reports
Animal toxicity studies[2]None found: no acute, repeat-dose or two-year cancer studiesMouse studies looked at life span, not toxicity

Small, short studies that do not look for harms will rarely find them. The 2026 review put it directly: “the lack of reported adverse events should not be interpreted as evidence of safety.”[3] The risks FDA raised are ones these studies could not have detected:

  • Immune reactions. FDA said injected peptides can provoke antibodies, a risk that “may be enhanced when peptides are given via SC ROA,” with consequences ranging from no symptoms to severe reactions. Clumping of the peptide and impurities in the raw material add to the risk.[2]
  • Cancer, in theory. The telomerase effect that sellers market is the same one FDA flagged as a possible cancer risk with long exposure. No study has tested this in people, and the mouse work was too short to settle it.[2]
  • Product quality. The certificates of analysis FDA reviewed for epitalon lacked tests for endotoxins and microbes, which matter most in an injection. The HHS policy’s conditions include those tests.[2][1] Our guide to reading a peptide certificate of analysis shows what to look for.

Side-effect lists on vendor and clinic pages do not come from published epitalon studies, because those studies reported none. Whatever their source, nobody has counted them.

If a prescriber offers epitalon

Under the policy, a compounded epitalon product must contain epitalon acetate alone, be made from tested raw material from an FDA-registered facility, carry the label “This is a compounded drug product. Not for resale,” and come with instructions for reporting problems.[1] Ask the prescriber what course length and dose they are using and where those numbers came from, since neither HHS nor the studies supply them. Epitalon has no approved label and so no labeled blood tests; peptide blood work and monitoring covers what can and cannot be checked.

Under the policy’s conditions, the pharmacy reports serious adverse events to FDA.[1] You or your prescriber can also report a problem directly through FDA MedWatch.[11] Telehealth sellers that list epitalon are tracked on our epitalon provider page, and the epitalon peptide profile covers seller context. If you also take a GLP-1 or any other prescription, tell the prescriber about the epitalon.

Frequently Asked Questions

The published human studies used 10 micrograms a day injected into muscle for 10 days in older adults, 5 micrograms per eye a day for 10 days by injection beside the eye in retinitis pigmentosa, and 0.5 mg a day as a spray under the tongue for 20 days in night-shift workers. All came from one St. Petersburg research group, each tested a single dose, and none established a safe or effective dose. No dose is approved.
FDA found websites recommending 5 to 10 mg a day. That is 500 to 1,000 times the injected daily dose reported in older adults. The range matches doses used for epithalamin, a cattle pineal extract that FDA treats as a different substance, and no published study links it to epitalon.
HHS’s interim policy, which is not FDA approval, covers compounded epitalon acetate only as an injection under the skin or into muscle, dispensed in intermittent courses, because the documented regimens were short courses rather than continuous use. The policy does not define how long a course is, how far apart courses should be, or what dose to use. The prescriber decides.
No. The policy covers epitalon acetate only as an injection. Semax is the only peptide on the list it covers for intranasal use. No published study has tested epitalon sprayed into the human nose; the human spray study used a spray under the tongue.
None were reported in the three small human studies, but those studies were short and did not systematically collect side effects. FDA found no toxicity studies and no reports in its adverse event database through December 2025. Its reviewers flagged possible immune reactions to injected peptide and a theoretical cancer risk from telomerase activation. Absence of reports is not evidence of safety.

References

  1. 1.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HHS Enforcement Discretion Policy Regarding 503A Compounding Using Certain Peptide Bulk Drug Substances, with Appendices A and B HHS. 2026. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs-503a-peptide-enforcement-discretion-policy-appendix-b.pdf
  2. 2.U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDA Briefing Document for Epitalon-Related Bulk Drug Substances (Epitalon (free base) and Epitalon acetate), Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, July 23-24, 2026 FDA. 2026. https://www.fda.gov/media/193345/download
  3. 3.Jain A, Gallacher DM, Issa MA, Deer TR, et al. Epitalon and Epithalamin: A Narrative Review of Mechanistic, Preclinical, and Clinical Evidence International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026. PMID: 42884164.
  4. 4.Khavinson V, Razumovsky M, Trofimova S, Grigorian R, et al. Pineal-regulating tetrapeptide epitalon improves eye retina condition in retinitis pigmentosa Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 2002. PMID: 12195242.
  5. 5.Korkushko OV, Lapin BA, Goncharova ND, Khavinson VKh, et al. Normalizing effect of the pineal gland peptides on the daily melatonin rhythm in old monkeys and elderly people (in Russian) Advances in Gerontology. 2007. PMID: 17969590.
  6. 6.Ivko OM, Linkova NS, Ilina AR, Sharova AA, Ryzhak GA AEDG peptide regulates human circadian rhythms genes expression during pineal gland accelerated aging (in Russian) Advances in Gerontology. 2020. PMID: 33280326.
  7. 7.Goncharova ND, Vengerin AA, Shmaliĭ AV, Khavinson VKh Peptide correction of age-related pineal disturbances in monkeys (in Russian) Advances in Gerontology. 2003. PMID: 14743609.
  8. 8.Anisimov VN, Khavinson VKh, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, et al. Effect of Epitalon on biomarkers of aging, life span and spontaneous tumor incidence in female Swiss-derived SHR mice Biogerontology. 2003. PMID: 14501183.
  9. 9.Korkushko OV, Khavinson VKh, Shatilo VB, Antonyuk-Shcheglova IA Geroprotective effect of epithalamine (pineal gland peptide preparation) in elderly subjects with accelerated aging Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2006. PMID: 17426848.
  10. 10.Sibarov DA, Kovalenko RI, Malinin VV, Khavinson VKh Epitalon influences pineal secretion in stress-exposed rats in the daytime Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 2002. PMID: 12500171.
  11. 11.U.S. Food and Drug Administration MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program FDA. 2026. https://www.fda.gov/safety/medwatch-fda-safety-information-and-adverse-event-reporting-program

Epitalon: What the Evidence Shows, and What FDA Found

Epitalon, a four-amino-acid peptide from one Russian lab, lengthened telomeres in cell studies. The human mortality results were for a pineal extract, not epitalon, and FDA's 2026 review found no human safety data.

11 min read

MOTS-c Dosage and Side Effects: What Has Been Tested in People

No MOTS-c dose has been tested in people. The only randomized trial with results used an analog, CB4211, at 25 mg daily for four weeks. What mouse doses mean, which side effects are documented, and what the October 2026 HHS policy allows.

11 min read

BPC-157 Dosage: What the Human Studies Actually Gave

There is no approved BPC-157 dose. The five published human studies used enemas, knee or bladder injections and IV infusions, never the subcutaneous, oral or topical routes sold. Why rat µg/kg doses and dosage charts do not convert.

9 min read

BPC-157 Side Effects: What Is Known in People, and What Nobody Has Measured

BPC-157 side effects in people: five small studies, three FDA adverse-event reports, what animal studies flag (clotting, liver, the tumor-growth debate), FDA’s immunogenicity concerns, and what the October 2026 HHS policy changes.

11 min read

BPC-157 and TB-500 Together: Blends, Stacks and the HHS Single-Ingredient Rule

No controlled human trial has tested BPC-157 with TB-500, or the Glow and Klow blends. The October 2026 HHS policy covers single-ingredient compounded peptides only, so a pre-mixed vial is outside it, and GHK-Cu is not on its list.

9 min read

BPC-157 Capsules: Oral BPC-157, the HHS Policy and What Is Known About Absorption

Supplement-store BPC-157 capsules are not approved or compounded drugs. HHS now allows oral BPC-157 only from 503A pharmacies on prescription, with proof of human absorption. What is known about BPC-157 in the stomach.

9 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

7.4

Enhance MD

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial: it names Tru Meds Rx

6.2

DudeMeds

Compounded semaglutide at $175/month, prepaid as a 3-month kit

7.2

Oak

A choice of compounded injections, oral semaglutide and brand-name GLP-1s from one cash-pay checkout

About this analysis

GLP Watchdog publishes independently. Each seller in our dataset is checked against that seller's own website, and the dataset is updated continuously. Read our full methodology →