Scientific deep-dive

Endoscopic Sleeve vs Surgical Sleeve: Less Weight Lost, Fewer Complications

A systematic review found endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty produced 13.7-15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5-23.6% for surgery, with complication rates, excluding the mildest grade, of 2.0-2.7% against 9.2-16.9%.

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed. Not medical advice · How we verify contentLast reviewed
5 min read·1 citation

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty stitches the stomach smaller through the mouth, with no incisions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cuts part of it away. A systematic review comparing them found the endoscopic procedure produced 13.7–15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5–23.6% for surgery, with complication rates (excluding the mildest grade) of 2.0–2.7% against 9.2–16.9%.[1] A fair comparison needs both numbers, because the choice is a trade between them.

The two columns

From five studies: three ESG cohorts and two case-matched comparisons. 1,451 ESG and 203 LSG patients.[1]
Endoscopic (ESG)Surgical (LSG)
Total body weight loss, 6 months13.7–15.2%23.5–23.6%
At 12 months—29.3% (one study)
At 18 and 24 months14.8% and 18.6%—
Complication rate, excluding the mildest grade2.0–2.7%9.2–16.9%
Grade IV or V complicationsnonenone

Read the rows against each other rather than in isolation. Surgery produced at least half again as much weight loss at six months. The endoscopic procedure produced roughly a quarter to a fifth as many complications. A person deciding between them is trading one for the other, and which trade is right depends on things a meta-analysis does not know about them.

The comparison is lopsided. 1,451 ESG patients against 203 LSG patients, across five studies, none of them randomized. The surgical numbers here are the comparator arms of a handful of small studies, not a summary of the very large sleeve-gastrectomy literature. Treat the ESG figures as reasonably supported and the LSG figures as a rough benchmark.

The plateau

The review’s own conclusion contains a line that matters more than either headline figure: weight loss results for the endoscopic procedure appear to plateau after the one-year mark.[1] The 18- and 24-month figures (14.8% and 18.6%) come from two different papers and sit within about five points of the six-month range.

If you are choosing a procedure on the strength of a six-month number, that is the sentence to weigh. A shallower curve that flattens early is a different long-term proposition from a steeper one, whatever the complication rates say.

Where the drugs sit in this

This comparison predates the current generation of weight-loss drugs being widely available, and neither procedure was compared against them here. That comparison is its own question, and we cover it separately: surgery versus GLP-1 drugs sets out how the two approaches compare on weight, and the line drawn by surgery covers the eligibility thresholds.

If you are considering either procedure, know that weight regain after bariatric surgery is common enough that GLP‑1 drugs are now used for it, which we cover in GLP-1s after bariatric surgery.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. In a systematic review, ESG produced 13.7 to 15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5 to 23.6% for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Its advantage is a lower complication rate, between 2.0 and 2.7% against 9.2 to 16.9%.
The review found ESG weight loss appears to plateau after the one-year mark, with medium-term figures of 14.8% at 18 months and 18.6% at 24 months. Weigh that flattening against a six-month headline.
On the complication rates in this review, yes. ESG's rate was roughly a quarter to a fifth of the rate reported for the surgical procedure, excluding the mildest grade. Neither procedure produced any grade IV or V complications in these studies.
Moderately. It pools five studies, none randomized, with 1,451 ESG patients against only 203 having the surgical procedure. The surgical figures are the comparator arms of small studies rather than a summary of the much larger sleeve gastrectomy literature.

References

  1. 1.Jalal MA, Cheng Q, Edye MB. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Obesity Surgery. 2020. PMID: 32304011.

How Long Is the Evidence, Actually?

These are indefinite treatments. In the largest randomized trial at the weight indication, the mean time on the drug was 34.2 months. What the long trials ran for, and what a short evidence base does and does not mean.

7 min read

Selank: Real Clinical Trials, One Country, No Replication

Selank was tested against a benzodiazepine in 62 patients with generalized anxiety disorder and reported similar anxiolytic effects. The study is from 2008, published in Russian, and has never been independently replicated.

5 min read

Melanotan and the Approved Drug It Is Not

An approved melanocortin-1 receptor agonist exists: afamelanotide, for preventing phototoxic pain in erythropoietic protoporphyria, given as a 16 mg implant under supervision. Melanotan II, sold for cosmetic tanning, is not that drug.

5 min read

Phentermine and a GLP-1 Together: What the Labels and Trials Show

Phentermine's label says combining it with any other weight-loss drug is not recommended; the Wegovy and Zepbound labels never mention it. The one trial, with liraglutide, found no meaningful extra loss. No semaglutide or tirzepatide trial exists.

10 min read

GLP-1 Drugs and Low Blood Sugar: Who Is Actually at Risk

A GLP-1 alone is a poor cause of hypoglycemia, because it prompts insulin only when glucose is already high. The risk belongs to what it is taken alongside, and the label says one combination has never been evaluated.

6 min read

GLP-1 Drugs, Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Blood Flow to the Foot

A randomized trial found liraglutide raised oxygen reaching the skin of the lower limb, with 89% of the drug group improving against 46% of controls. A 125,150-person cohort recorded amputation in 2.34% of semaglutide users against 5.21%.

6 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

9.0

YourEra

Semaglutide at $99/month, well below the typical price

9.3

Embody

A flat compounded tirzepatide or semaglutide price at every dose, from a seller that names its pharmacies

6.4

Bodybuilding Health+

Seeing what it charges before you answer any medical questions

About this analysis

GLP Watchdog publishes independently. Each seller in our dataset is checked against that seller's own website, and the dataset is updated continuously. Read our full methodology →