Scientific deep-dive

Endoscopic Sleeve vs Surgical Sleeve: Less Weight Lost, Fewer Complications

A systematic review found endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty produced 13.7-15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5-23.6% for surgery, with complication rates of 2.0-2.7% against 9.2-16.9%.

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed
5 min read·1 citations

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty stitches the stomach smaller through the mouth, with no incisions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy cuts part of it away. A systematic review comparing them found the endoscopic procedure produced 13.7–15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5–23.6% for surgery — and complication rates of 2.0–2.7% against 9.2–16.9%.[1] Neither of those is the whole answer. Together they are the actual choice.

The two columns

From five studies: three ESG cohorts and two case-matched comparisons. 1,451 ESG and 203 LSG patients.[1]
Endoscopic (ESG)Surgical (LSG)
Total body weight loss, 6 months13.7–15.2%23.5–23.6%
At 12 months29.3% (one study)
At 18 and 24 months14.8% and 18.6%
Complication rate2.0–2.7%9.2–16.9%
Grade IV or V complicationsnonenone

Read the rows against each other rather than in isolation. Surgery produced roughly half again as much weight loss at six months. The endoscopic procedure produced roughly a quarter to a fifth as many complications. A person deciding between them is trading one for the other, and which trade is right depends on things a meta-analysis does not know about them.

⚠⚠ The comparison is lopsided. 1,451 ESG patients against 203 LSG patients, across five studies, none of them randomized. The surgical numbers here are the comparator arms of a handful of small studies, not a summary of the very large sleeve-gastrectomy literature. Treat the ESG figures as reasonably supported and the LSG figures as a rough benchmark.

The plateau

The review’s own conclusion contains a line that matters more than either headline figure: weight loss results for the endoscopic procedure appear to plateau after the one-year mark.[1] The 18- and 24-month figures — 14.8% and 18.6% — are consistent with that, sitting close to where six months already was.

If you are choosing a procedure on the strength of a six-month number, that is the sentence to weigh. A shallower curve that flattens early is a different long-term proposition from a steeper one, whatever the complication rates say.

Where the drugs sit in this

This comparison predates the current generation of weight-loss drugs being widely available, and neither procedure was compared against them here. That comparison is its own question, and we cover it separately: surgery versus GLP-1 drugs sets out how the two approaches compare on weight, and what the line drawn by surgery actually is covers the eligibility thresholds.

One thing worth knowing if you are considering either procedure: weight regain after bariatric surgery is common enough that GLP‑1 drugs are now used for it, which we cover in GLP-1s after bariatric surgery.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. In a systematic review, ESG produced 13.7 to 15.2% total body weight loss at six months against 23.5 to 23.6% for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Its advantage is a lower complication rate, between 2.0 and 2.7% against 9.2 to 16.9%.
The review found ESG weight loss appears to plateau after the one-year mark, with medium-term figures of 14.8% at 18 months and 18.6% at 24 months. That flattening is worth weighing against a six-month headline.
On the complication rates in this review, yes — roughly a quarter to a fifth of the rate reported for the surgical procedure, excluding the mildest grade. Neither procedure produced any grade IV or V complications in these studies.
Moderately. It pools five studies, none randomized, with 1,451 ESG patients against only 203 having the surgical procedure. The surgical figures are the comparator arms of small studies rather than a summary of the much larger sleeve gastrectomy literature.

References

  1. 1.Jalal MA, Cheng Q, Edye MB. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Obesity Surgery. 2020. PMID: 32304011.

Amycretin: A 24% Weight Figure, and the Trial It Came From

Once-weekly amycretin produced an estimated 24.3% bodyweight reduction at 36 weeks against 1.1% on placebo — from a single-site phase 1b/2a study of 125 people whose primary endpoint was counting adverse events.

5 min read

Another Molecule You Cannot Buy

A dual agonist reported 14.7% weight loss in thirteen weeks. The drug is approved nowhere, and a thirteen-week figure sits on the steepest part of a curve that flattens.

6 min read

Beyond the Scale: Blood Pressure, Lipids and What Else Changes

Pooling the individual records of 3,136 people, systolic blood pressure fell 4.95 mmHg further than placebo — and by about the same amount whether or not the person had hypertension.

7 min read

Bone Density on a GLP-1: The Trial That Compared It Against Exercise

A four-arm randomized trial found liraglutide alone lost hip and spine bone density relative to exercise — while the combination arm lost the most weight and held bone density level with placebo.

7 min read

Cancer Risk in People Without Diabetes

A study in obese adults without diabetes found 41% lower incidence of obesity-associated cancers. The median follow-up was two years — far too short to establish that a drug prevented anything.

6 min read

Compounded GLP-1s and the Adverse Event Reports

A FAERS study found more adverse event reports for compounded GLP-1s. Reports are voluntary and there is no denominator — but one finding survives that critique, and it is about arithmetic.

6 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

6.7

Luvo Health

Moving between compounded and brand without changing seller

8.5

Strut Health

Semaglutide at $99/month, 48% under the register median

8.0

Pallas Health

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names Belmar Pharmacy