← All FDA warning letters

FDA Warning Letter · #721600

Mile High Compounds LLC — FDA Warning Letter (March 31, 2026)

Issued March 31, 2026Status: activeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

Primary Source

View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/mile-high-compounds-llc-721600-03312026

Summary

Company
Mile High Compounds LLC
Letter number
#721600
Issue date
March 31, 2026
Subject
Unapproved New Drugs Sold Over the Internet

What FDA cited

FDA cited the company in connection with the marketing and distribution of compounded GLP-1 products. See the linked FDA warning letter for the full text of the agency's concerns and the specific provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act referenced.

How this letter sits against the other 156

Our reading, from the 157 letters on this register — not part of the FDA’s document.

5 letters on this register carry the date March 31, 2026, so this was a small group action rather than a mass sweep.

A warning letter is the agency putting a company on notice, not a court finding and not a ban. What it is worth to you is in what it alleges, so read the original on fda.gov rather than the fact that one exists.

Word for word, from the letter of March 31, 2026

This letter is to advise you that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website at https://milehighcompounds.is, which links to your community forum www.skool.com/milehighcompoundsofficial/, from January to March 2026. The FDA has observed that your website offers “GLP-1 SM,” “GLP-2 TRZ,” “GLP-3 RT” and “BAC Water” (hereinafter Mile High Compounds products) for sale in the United States. Based on our review, these products are unapproved new drugs under section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 355(a). As explained further below, introducing or delivering these products for introduction into interstate commerce violates sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(d) and 355(a).

These products are especially concerning from a public health perspective because injectable drug products can pose risks of serious harm to users. Injectable products are delivered directly into the body, sometimes directly into the bloodstream, and therefore, bypass some of the body’s key defenses against toxins and microorganisms that can lead to serious and life-threatening conditions.

Despite statements on your product labeling marketing your products for “in vitro research and educational purposes only” and “not for human or veterinary consumption,” evidence obtained from your website establishes that your products are intended to be drugs for human use. Your products are drugs as defined by section 201(g)(1) of the FD&C Act 21, U.S.C. 321(g)(1), because they are intended to prevent, treat, or cure disease conditions and/or affect the structure or function of the body.

Examples from your product labeling, including on your website, that provide evidence of the intended use (as defined in 21 CFR 201.128) of these products as drugs include, but may not be limited to, the following:

BAC WaterYour firm offers “BAC Water” for sale alongside peptide products, which are drugs intended for injection and require reconstitution, including the above-mentioned products. The sale of these products together demonstrates that you intend for your “BAC Water” to be used in combination for injection. Therefore, your “BAC Water” is a drug.

Your Mile High Compounds products are “new drugs” under section 201(p) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(p), because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) for use under the above-described conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in their labeling. With certain exceptions not applicable here, a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without an approved application from FDA in effect, as described in section 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(a). No approved applications pursuant to section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355, are in effect for these products. Accordingly, these products are unapproved new drugs. The introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of these unapproved new drug products violates sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(d) and 355(a).

The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive statement of violations that may exist in connection with your products. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of any violations and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to ensure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law, including FDA regulations.

This letter notifies you of our concerns and provides you an opportunity to address them. Failure to adequately address this matter may lead to regulatory or legal action including, without limitation, seizure and injunction.

Quoted word for word from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We assert nothing beyond what the agency published, and the full letter is at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/mile-high-compounds-llc-721600-03312026

What FDA warning letters mean

It is the agency writing to a company to say it believes something that company is doing breaks the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act — usually a claim on a website, a labeling choice, or how a drug is being made. The company has about fifteen working days to write back.

Read carefully what it is not. It is not a recall, not a criminal charge, and not a court deciding anyone broke the law. It is the regulator opening a file. Companies frequently answer a letter, fix what was cited, and carry on trading, and when FDA accepts that it can issue a close-out letter. We do not track close-outs, so the presence of a letter on this page tells you what FDA said on one date — not where the matter stands today. Ask the company; they will usually tell you, and how they answer is informative in itself.

Across this market the same three citations recur: claiming a compounded product is equivalent to an approved one, labeling that misleads, and compounding from bulk substances FDA has not cleared under sections 503A and 503B. If you are reading a letter here, it is probably one of those.

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

9.3

Embody

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial: it names RedRock Pharmacy

8.2

YourEra

Semaglutide at $99/month, 63% below the typical price

8.7

Gala

Moving between compounded and brand without changing seller

Other warning letters in our database

View the full database →

Editorial Disclaimer

This is a public communication from a regulator, and by itself it settles nothing about whether the company broke any law. Corrective action is a common response, and a fair number of letters end in a close-out. Read the whole thing on fda.gov through the link above rather than taking our excerpt as the full picture.

Glossary

The words sellers use, defined. Tap any term.