← All FDA warning letters

FDA Warning Letter · #738238

Empower Pharmacy — FDA Warning Letter (September 18, 2026)

Legal name: Empower Clinic Services, LLC

Issued September 18, 2026Status: activeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

Primary Source

View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/empower-clinic-services-llc-dba-empower-pharmacy-738238-09182026

Summary

Company
Empower Clinic Services, LLC (dba Empower Pharmacy)
Letter number
#738238
Issue date
September 18, 2026
Subject
CGMP/Finished Pharmaceuticals/Adulterated/Unapproved New Drug

What FDA cited

During the inspection, the FDA investigators collected evidence indicating that drug products produced by your firm failed to meet the conditions of section 503A. For example, the investigators collected evidence indicating that your firm compounded drug products that are essentially copies of commercially available drug products regularly and in inordinate amounts.

How this letter sits against the other 157

Our reading, from the 158 letters on this register — not part of the FDA’s document.

No other letter on this register carries the date September 18, 2026. The agency acted against this company on its own that day, which is uncommon here — most of the letters we hold arrived in sweeps.

A warning letter is the agency putting a company on notice, not a court finding and not a ban. What it is worth to you is in what it alleges, so read the original on fda.gov rather than the fact that one exists.

Word for word, from the letter of September 18, 2026

From November 3, 2025, through November 14, 2025, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigators inspected your facility, Empower Clinic Services, LLC dba Empower Pharmacy, located at 7601 N. Sam Houston Pkwy W., Ste. 100, Houston, TX 77064. During the inspection, the investigators collected evidence indicating that drug products you produced failed to meet the conditions of section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. § 353a] for exemption from certain provisions of the FD&C Act. In addition, the investigators noted serious deficiencies in your practices for producing drug products, which put patients at risk.

Section 503A of the FD&C Act describes the conditions under which human drug products compounded by a licensed pharmacist in a State licensed pharmacy or a Federal facility, or a licensed physician, qualify for exemptions from three sections of the FD&C Act: compliance with current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) (section 501(a)(2)(B)); labeling with adequate directions for use (section 502(f)(1)); and FDA approval prior to marketing (section 505) [21 U.S.C. §§ 351(a)(2)(B), 352(f)(1) and 355(a)].1 Receipt of valid prescriptions for individually-identified patients is one of the conditions for the exemptions under section 503A.

In addition, for a compounded drug product to qualify for the exemptions under section 503A, a licensed pharmacist or physician must not compound regularly or in inordinate amounts any drug products that are essentially copies of a commercially available drug product.2 Section 503A(b)(2) provides that a compounded drug product is not essentially a copy of a commercially available drug product if “there is a change, made for an identified individual patient, which produces for that patient a significant difference, as determined by the prescribing practitioner, between the compounded drug and the comparable commercially available drug product.” (sections 503A(b)(1)(D) and 503A(b)(2) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. §§ 353a(b)(1)(D) and 353a(b)(2)]).

During the inspection, the FDA investigators collected evidence indicating that drug products produced by your firm failed to meet the conditions of section 503A. For example, the investigators collected evidence indicating that your firm compounded drug products that are essentially copies of commercially available drug products regularly and in inordinate amounts. Specifically, your firm compounded products including TIRZEPATIDE/NIACINAMIDE (4 ML)(17/2 MG/ML), SEMAGLUTIDE/CYANOCOBALAMIN (1 ML)(5/0.5 MG/ML), and TIRZEPATIDE/NIACINAMIDE (2.5 ML)(8/2 MG/ML), which appear to be essentially copies of FDA-approved semaglutide and tirzepatide products.3, 4 FDA is aware of high demand for compounded versions of FDA-approved semaglutide and tirzepatide products. The volume of products you are producing suggests that differences between products you are compounding and the FDA-approved products are pretextual.

According to your firm's records, for example, you compounded and filled orders for the aforementioned drug products in the following quantities:

Evidence collected includes (1) orders/prescriptions that lack any prescriber determination of significant difference from the commercially available product; (2) orders/prescriptions with purported prescriber determinations of “significant difference” that appear to be repeated verbatim across many records, suggesting that they may be pre-generated for selection by the prescriber, rather than written by the prescriber for an identified individual patient; and (3) the volume of particular products compounded and orders filled. Generating prescriptions through means that undermine the individualized nature of a prescriber's clinical judgment (for example through third-party technology platforms that provide prescribers with pre-selected menu options for choosing a statement of significant difference) call the individualized nature of those determinations into question, potentially undermining claims that such prescriber determinations of significant difference are sufficient to meet the conditions of section 503A.

Furthermore, production records collected during the inspection indicate that your firm compounded these drug products regularly or in inordinate amounts.

Therefore, you compounded drug products that do not meet the conditions of section 503A and are not eligible for the exemptions in that section, including the FDA approval requirement of section 505 of the FD&C Act, the requirement under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act that labeling bear adequate directions for use, and the requirement of compliance with CGMP under section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act. In the remainder of this letter, we refer to your drug products that do not qualify for exemptions under section 503A as the “ineligible drug products.”

Quoted word for word from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We assert nothing beyond what the agency published, and the full letter is at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/empower-clinic-services-llc-dba-empower-pharmacy-738238-09182026

What FDA warning letters mean

It is the agency writing to a company to say it believes something that company is doing breaks the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act — usually a claim on a website, a labeling choice, or how a drug is being made. The company has about fifteen working days to write back.

Read carefully what it is not. It is not a recall, not a criminal charge, and not a court deciding anyone broke the law. It is the regulator opening a file. Companies frequently answer a letter, fix what was cited, and carry on trading, and when FDA accepts that it can issue a close-out letter. We do not track close-outs, so the presence of a letter on this page tells you what FDA said on one date — not where the matter stands today. Ask the company; they will usually tell you, and how they answer is informative in itself.

Across this market the same three citations recur: claiming a compounded product is equivalent to an approved one, labeling that misleads, and compounding from bulk substances FDA has not cleared under sections 503A and 503B. If you are reading a letter here, it is probably one of those.

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

9.4

Trimi Health

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial: it names VialsRx

6.4

ShedRx

Oral orforglipron alongside the injectables

9.0

bmiMD

Starting below a standard dose, with microdose tiers

Other warning letters in our database

View the full database →

Editorial Disclaimer

This is a public communication from a regulator, and by itself it settles nothing about whether the company broke any law. Corrective action is a common response, and a fair number of letters end in a close-out. Read the whole thing on fda.gov through the link above rather than taking our excerpt as the full picture.

Glossary

The words sellers use, defined. Tap any term.