FDA Warning Letter · #721806
Gram Peptides — FDA Warning Letter (March 31, 2026)
Primary Source
View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/gram-peptides-721806-03312026
Summary
- Company
- Gram Peptides
- Letter number
- #721806
- Issue date
- March 31, 2026
- Subject
- Unapproved New Drugs Sold Over the Internet
What FDA cited
FDA cited the company in connection with the marketing and distribution of compounded GLP-1 products. See the linked FDA warning letter for the full text of the agency's concerns and the specific provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act referenced.
How this letter sits against the other 156
Our reading, from the 157 letters on this register — not part of the FDA’s document.
5 letters on this register carry the date March 31, 2026, so this was a small group action rather than a mass sweep.
A warning letter is the agency putting a company on notice, not a court finding and not a ban. What it is worth to you is in what it alleges, so read the original on fda.gov rather than the fact that one exists.
From the letter
Read full letter on FDA.gov →Word for word, from the letter of March 31, 2026
This letter is to advise you that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website at https://grampeptides.com from January to March 2026. The FDA has observed that your website offers “Retatrutide” (also referred to by your firm as “GLP-1-R peptide”) and “Tirzepatide” (also referred to by your firm as “GLP-2 peptide”) and “Bacteriostatic Water for Injection” (hereinafter Gram Peptides products) for sale in the United States. Based on our review, these products are unapproved new drugs under section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 355(a). As explained further below, introducing or delivering these products for introduction into interstate commerce violates sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(d) and 355(a).
These products are especially concerning from a public health perspective because injectable drug products can pose risks of serious harm to users. Injectable products are delivered directly into the body, sometimes directly into the bloodstream, and therefore, bypass some of the body’s key defenses against toxins and microorganisms that can lead to serious and life-threatening conditions.
Despite statements on your product labeling marketing your products for “Research Use Only,” and “not intended for human consumption, medical use, or veterinary use,” evidence obtained from your website establishes that your products are intended to be drugs for human use. Your products are drugs as defined by section 201(g)(1) of the FD&C Act 21, U.S.C. 321(g)(1), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and/or intended to affect the structure or function of the body.
Examples from your product labeling, including on your website, that provide evidence of the intended use (as defined in 21 CFR 201.128) of these products as drugs include, but may not be limited to, the following:
Retatrutide (also referred to as “GLP-1-R Peptide”)On the webpage https://grampeptides.com/product/retatrutide/:
Tirzepatide (also referred to as “GLP-2 Peptide”)On the webpage https://grampeptides.com/product/tirzepatide/:
Bacteriostatic Water for InjectionYour firm offers “Bacteriostatic Water for Injection” for sale alongside peptide products, which are drugs intended for injection and require reconstitution, including the two above-mentioned GLP products. The sale of these products together demonstrates that you intend for your “Bacteriostatic Water for Injection” to be used in combination for injection. Therefore, your “Bacteriostatic Water for Injection” is a drug.
Your Gram Peptides products are “new drugs” under section 201(p) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(p), because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) for use under the above-described conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in their labeling. With certain exceptions not applicable here, a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without an approved application from FDA in effect, as described in section 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(a). No approved applications pursuant to section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355, are in effect for these products. Accordingly, these products are unapproved new drugs. The introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of these unapproved new drug products violates sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(d) and 355(a).
Quoted word for word from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We assert nothing beyond what the agency published, and the full letter is at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/gram-peptides-721806-03312026
What FDA warning letters mean
It is the agency writing to a company to say it believes something that company is doing breaks the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act — usually a claim on a website, a labeling choice, or how a drug is being made. The company has about fifteen working days to write back.
Read carefully what it is not. It is not a recall, not a criminal charge, and not a court deciding anyone broke the law. It is the regulator opening a file. Companies frequently answer a letter, fix what was cited, and carry on trading, and when FDA accepts that it can issue a close-out letter. We do not track close-outs, so the presence of a letter on this page tells you what FDA said on one date — not where the matter stands today. Ask the company; they will usually tell you, and how they answer is informative in itself.
Across this market the same three citations recur: claiming a compounded product is equivalent to an approved one, labeling that misleads, and compounding from bulk substances FDA has not cleared under sections 503A and 503B. If you are reading a letter here, it is probably one of those.
Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked
These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.
No insurance needed · vetted by our editors
Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more
YourEra
Semaglutide at $99/month, 63% below the typical price
Pricing Compare
Get started →Gala
Moving between compounded and brand without changing seller
Pricing Compare
Get started →CoreAge Rx
Semaglutide at $99/month, 48% below the typical price
Pricing Compare
Get started →Other warning letters in our database
- Empower Pharmacy — September 18, 2026
- Peak Performance Peptides — August 24, 2026
- Royal Peptides LLC — August 24, 2026
- NuScience Peptides LLC — August 24, 2026
- Peptide Partners LLC — August 24, 2026
Editorial Disclaimer
This is a public communication from a regulator, and by itself it settles nothing about whether the company broke any law. Corrective action is a common response, and a fair number of letters end in a close-out. Read the whole thing on fda.gov through the link above rather than taking our excerpt as the full picture.
Glossary
The words sellers use, defined. Tap any term.
- Compounded GLP-1 · Pharmacy and drug forms
- 503A pharmacy · Pharmacy and drug forms
- 503B outsourcing facility · Pharmacy and drug forms
- PCAB accreditation · Pharmacy and drug forms
- FDA Warning Letter · Insurance and regulatory
- Off-label use · Insurance and regulatory
- FDA Drug Shortage List · Insurance and regulatory