← All FDA warning letters

FDA Warning Letter · #715883

GLP-1 Solution — FDA Warning Letter (September 9, 2025)

Issued September 9, 2025Status: activeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

Primary Source

View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/glp-1-solution-715883-09092025

Summary

Company
GLP-1 Solution
Letter number
#715883
Issue date
September 9, 2025
Subject
Unlawful Sale of Unapproved and Misbranded Drugs to United States Consumers Over the Internet (Telehealth)

What FDA cited

This letter is to advise you that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website content at the internet address https://glp1solution.store in August 2025 and has observed that your website offers various compounded drug products, including retatrutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide.1 As described below, your retatrutide drug products are unapproved new drugs and misbranded drugs introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of sections 505(a), 502(f)(1), 301(a) and 301(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) [21 U.S.C.

How this letter sits against the other 185

Our reading, from the 186 letters on this register — not part of the FDA’s document.

The FDA issued 97 of the 186 letters on this register on the same day, September 9, 2025, the largest single action in our records. This company was part of a sweep rather than singled out — which does not make the letter less serious, but it does mean the agency was acting against a practice across the market, not against one seller's conduct alone.

This is not the only letter to this operator. We hold 2 for the same company, from September 9, 2025 to September 9, 2025. A repeat letter is a materially stronger signal than a first one: it means the agency wrote once and then wrote again. Read them together rather than one at a time.

A warning letter is the agency putting a company on notice, not a court finding and not a ban. What it is worth to you is in what it alleges, so read the original on fda.gov rather than the fact that one exists.

Other letters to this operator

Word for word, from the letter of September 9, 2025

This letter is to advise you that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website content at the internet address https://glp1solution.store in August 2025 and has observed that your website offers various compounded drug products, including retatrutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide.1 As described below, your retatrutide drug products are unapproved new drugs and misbranded drugs introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of sections 505(a), 502(f)(1), 301(a) and 301(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) [21 U.S.C. §§ 355(a), 352(f)(1), 331(a) and 331(d)]. In addition, your claims concerning compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide products are false or misleading under sections 502(a) and 502(bb) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) [21 U.S.C. §§ 352(a) and 352(bb)], resulting in products being introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of section 301(a) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 331(a)].

Section 503A of the FDCA describes the conditions under which human drug products compounded by a licensed pharmacist in a State licensed pharmacy or a Federal facility, or a licensed physician, qualify for exemptions from three sections of the FDCA: compliance with current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) (section 501(a)(2)(B)); labeling with adequate directions for use (section 502(f)(1)); and FDA approval prior to marketing (section 505) [21 U.S.C. §§ 351(a)(2)(B), 352(f)(1) and 355(a)].2

Under section 503B(b) of the FDCA, a compounder can register as an outsourcing facility with FDA. Drug products compounded by or under the direct supervision of a licensed pharmacist in an outsourcing facility qualify for exemptions from the drug approval requirements in section 505 of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)], the requirement in section 502(f)(1) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)] that labeling bear adequate directions for use and the Drug Supply Chain Security Act requirements in section 582 of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 360eee-1] if the conditions in section 503B of the FDCA are met.3

Among the conditions of sections 503A and 503B are restrictions on the bulk drug substances (active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs) that may be used to compound human drug products. Under section 503A, one of the conditions that must be met for a compounded drug product to qualify for the exemptions is that, if the product is compounded using bulk drug substances, such bulk drug substances (I) comply with the standards of an applicable United States Pharmacopeia (USP) or National Formulary (NF) monograph, if a monograph exists, and the USP chapter on pharmacy compounding; (II) if such a monograph does not exist, be components of drugs approved by the Secretary; or (III) if such a monograph does not exist and the drug substance is not a component of a drug approved by the Secretary, appear on a list developed by the Secretary through regulation (“503A bulks list”) (section 503A(b)(1)(A)(i) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 353a(b)(1)(A)(i)]).

Similarly, one of the conditions that must be met for a drug product compounded by an outsourcing facility to qualify for the exemptions under section 503B of the FDCA, is that the outsourcing facility does not compound drug products using bulk drug substances unless the bulk drug substances that are used appear on a list established by the Secretary identifying bulk drug substances for which there is a clinical need (“503B bulks list”), or the compounded drug appears on the drug shortage list in effect under section 506E of the FDCA at the time of compounding, distribution, and dispensing (section 503B(a)(2)(A)(i) of the FDCA [21 U.S.C. § 353b(a)(2)(A)]).

Your compounded retatrutide drug products fail to meet the conditions of sections 503A and 503B. Drug products compounded using retatrutide are not eligible for the exemptions provided by section 503A, because retatrutide is not the subject of an applicable USP or NF monograph, is not a component of an FDA-approved human drug, and does not appear on the 503A bulks list.4

Drug products compounded using retatrutide are not eligible for the exemptions provided by section 503B, because retatrutide does not appear on the 503B bulks list, and is not used to compound a drug that appears on the drug shortage list.5

Because your compounded retatrutide drug products have not met all of the conditions of either section 503A or section 503B, they are not eligible for the exemptions in those sections from certain requirements of the FDCA, including FDA approval requirements of section 505 and the requirement under section 502(f)(1) that labeling bear adequate directions for use.

Quoted word for word from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We assert nothing beyond what the agency published, and the full letter is at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/glp-1-solution-715883-09092025

What FDA warning letters mean

It is the agency writing to a company to say it believes something that company is doing breaks the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act — usually a claim on a website, a labeling choice, or how a drug is being made. The company has about fifteen working days to write back.

Read carefully what it is not. It is not a recall, not a criminal charge, and not a court deciding anyone broke the law. It is the regulator opening a file. Companies frequently answer a letter, fix what was cited, and carry on trading, and when FDA accepts that it can issue a close-out letter. We do not track close-outs, so the presence of a letter on this page tells you what FDA said on one date — not where the matter stands today. Ask the company; they will usually tell you, and how they answer is informative in itself.

Across this market the same three citations recur: claiming a compounded product is equivalent to an approved one, labeling that misleads, and compounding from bulk substances FDA has not cleared under sections 503A and 503B. If you are reading a letter here, it is probably one of those.

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

7.7

Breeze Meds

Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names Belmar Pharmacy

8.3

Telos Rx

Starting below a standard dose, with microdose tiers

8.8

Gala

Moving between compounded and brand without changing seller

Other warning letters in our database

View the full database →

Editorial Disclaimer

This is a public communication from a regulator, and by itself it settles nothing about whether the company broke any law. Corrective action is a common response, and a fair number of letters end in a close-out. Read the whole thing on fda.gov through the link above rather than taking our excerpt as the full picture.

Glossary

The words sellers use, defined. Tap any term.