Data investigation
Does a Lifetime of It Change Anything?
People who have carried excess weight since childhood often assume a drug will not work for them. Across 3,782 participants in three trials, obesity beginning before age 25 made no difference to the response.
People who have carried excess weight since childhood often assume a drug will not work for them — that something is more entrenched, more constitutional, less reversible. An analysis of 3,782 participants across three trials tested that directly. Those whose obesity began before age 25 lost 23% of their body weight on tirzepatide. Those whose began later lost 22%.[1]
The comparison
Participants in SURMOUNT-1, SURMOUNT-3 and SURMOUNT-4 were divided by whether their obesity was diagnosed before or after age 25, and followed for 72 weeks. The early-onset group had lived with it for a mean of 20 years against 11.
| Measure | Early onset | Later onset |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight | −23% | −22% |
| Waist circumference | −22 cm | −19 cm |
| HbA1c | −0.51% | −0.52% |
| Triglycerides | −32% | −31% |
| Systolic blood pressure | −8 mmHg | −8 mmHg |
Twice the duration, and no penalty on any measure.
The same pattern held across all three trials. Whatever else two decades of obesity does, it does not appear to blunt the response to this drug — which is a specific piece of reassurance for a group that is often told, or tells itself, the opposite.
The paradox at baseline, and the confounder in it
The two groups did not start in the same place, and the differences run in unexpected directions.
| Early onset | Later onset | |
|---|---|---|
| Obesity duration | 20 ± 12 years | 11 ± 8 years |
| BMI | 40 ± 7 | 37 ± 6 |
| Waist circumference | 118 ± 16 cm | 112 ± 14 cm |
| HbA1c | 5.48% | 5.60% |
| Triglycerides | 120 mg/dL | 130 mg/dL |
| Systolic blood pressure | 121 mmHg | 125 mmHg |
More adiposity, on both measures — and better blood sugar, triglycerides and blood pressure. The authors describe it as a mixed metabolic profile, which it is.
If it survives adjustment, it would be genuinely interesting — suggesting that adiposity acquired young is somehow less metabolically damaging per unit than adiposity acquired later. That is a real hypothesis and this analysis does not establish it.
What it is good for
- It answers a question people carry into the appointment. Long-standing obesity does not predict a worse response, on this evidence.
- It is post hoc, splitting trials by a characteristic they were not designed around.
- Age at diagnosis is self-reported and imprecise in a way that blurs the boundary between the groups.
- Funded by Eli Lilly, which makes tirzepatide.
It also sits alongside two other findings on who responds. Rare genetic causes of obesity did not reduce response either — genetics caused it and the drug still worked. And common genetic variants shift expected weight loss by well under a kilogram — the genetics are real, and small.
Taken together, a pattern: the things people expect to predict a poor response — how long you have had it, whether it runs in your family, whether there is a genetic cause — mostly do not. What does predict outcome, on the evidence in this corpus, is whether someone is still taking the drug a year later.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- 1.Gourgari E, Srivastava G, Kelly AS, et al. Early-Onset Obesity and Tirzepatide Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURMOUNT Clinical Trials Obesity. 2025. PMID: 40717199.
Related research
A Trial About the Measuring Instrument
SAMARA will be reported as showing semaglutide improves fatty liver disease. It was built to ask whether non-invasive tests can replace a biopsy — and the drug was the tool used to answer it.
7 min read
Genetics Caused It, and the Drug Still Worked
MC4R mutations are the most common single genetic cause of obesity, and sit at the center of the brain's appetite pathway. Carriers in SURMOUNT-1 lost 18.3% of their weight against 19.9% in everyone else.
6 min read
The Genetic Test That Isn't Ready
A paper titled 'GLP1R and OCT1 variants modulate semaglutide response' reports in its own results that the GLP1R signal did not survive correction — in an arm of ten. Carries a correction: larger work has since found real predictors.
5 min read
The Genetics Are Real, and Small
A genome-wide study found genuine genetic predictors of GLP-1 weight loss and side effects, at overwhelming significance. The efficacy effect is about three-quarters of a kilogram per copy.
8 min read
A Composite Is Only Its Components
A reanalysis found tirzepatide getting far more patients to three or more treatment targets. The comparator was semaglutide at 1 mg, and the gap was carried by two of the four targets.
7 min read
An Oral Pill in a Diabetes Population
Over 72 weeks a daily tablet took 9.6% off the scale for people carrying obesity alongside type 2 diabetes. Why we will not set that figure beside the injectable trials.
7 min read
Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked
These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.
No insurance needed · vetted by our editors
Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more
SnagRx
Semaglutide at $99/month, 48% under the register median
Pricing Compare
Get started →Embody
Knowing which pharmacy fills the vial — it names RedRock Pharmacy
Pricing Compare
Get started →YourEra
Semaglutide at $99/month, 63% under the register median
Pricing Compare
Get started →