Scientific deep-dive

Amycretin: A 24% Weight Figure, and the Trial It Came From

Once-weekly amycretin produced an estimated 24.3% bodyweight reduction at 36 weeks against 1.1% on placebo — from a single-site phase 1b/2a study of 125 people whose primary endpoint was counting adverse events.

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed
5 min read·1 citations

Two receptors, one drug: amycretin was built to hit the GLP‑1 target and the amylin target at once, rather than pairing two compounds. In its first substantial trial, once-weekly subcutaneous amycretin at 60 mg produced an estimated mean bodyweight change of −24.3% at week 36, against −1.1% on placebo.[1] That is a larger figure than anything currently approved. It is also a phase 1b/2a study at one clinical site, with 101 people on the drug, whose primary endpoint was counting adverse events rather than measuring weight.

What the trial was

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1b/2a study at a single research center in San Antonio, Texas, in people aged 18 to 55 with a BMI between 27.0 and 39.9. It ran in five parts — a single ascending dose, a dose-escalation arm and three dose-response arms — with treatment durations between 20 and 36 weeks depending on the part. 125 participants were randomized: 101 to amycretin, 24 to placebo.[1]

Estimated mean bodyweight change from baseline, by trial part. ⚠ Parts ran for different durations and are not a like-for-like ladder.[1]
PartMaintenance doseAmycretinPlaceboTimepoint
B60 mg−24.3%−1.1%week 36
C20 mg−22.0%+1.9%week 36
D5 mg−16.2%+2.3%week 28
E1.25 mg−9.7%+2.0%week 20

The gradient is the most persuasive thing in the table. More drug, more weight lost, in order, with no reversal — that is what a genuine pharmacological effect looks like, and it is harder to produce by accident than a single impressive number. Note that placebo participants gained weight in three of the four parts.

The primary endpoint was the number of treatment-emergent adverse events. Bodyweight was a secondary endpoint. A trial designed to establish safety and pharmacokinetics is not designed to measure efficacy precisely, and its weight figures should be read as encouraging rather than established. The study was funded by Novo Nordisk.

The withdrawals, and what they do and do not mean

The paper records that a large number of participants withdrew, with a high proportion of those discontinuations occurring for reasons unrelated to treatment-emergent adverse events.[1] That is a meaningfully different situation from a trial where people leave because the drug is intolerable — but it still shrinks the group any endpoint is calculated from, in a study that was not large to begin with.

On tolerability itself, the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, mostly mild to moderate, and the majority resolved by the end of the study. The authors describe the rates as similar to those seen in early-phase studies of GLP‑1 and amylin agonists generally.[1]

Why adding amylin is the interesting part

Amylin is a hormone co-secreted with insulin that slows gastric emptying and signals fullness through a different pathway from GLP‑1. Reaching both targets from one compound is an attempt to add effect without simply pushing a GLP‑1 dose higher — which is the approach that runs into the tolerability ceiling visible in every trial of this class.

Whether that theory survives a phase 3 is the open question, and nothing in a 125-person study answers it. For what happened to another promising oral compound whose trial worked while most participants did not finish it, see danuglipron. For the approved oral small molecule, see orforglipron.

Frequently Asked Questions

In a phase 1b/2a study, estimated mean bodyweight change at the 60 mg dose was −24.3% at week 36 against −1.1% on placebo. Lower doses produced −22.0% at 20 mg, −16.2% at 5 mg and −9.7% at 1.25 mg, across parts of different durations.
The figure is larger than anything currently approved, but it comes from an early-phase, single-site trial with 101 people on the drug and weight as a secondary endpoint. Early-phase results routinely shrink in larger studies, and no head-to-head comparison exists.
One compound engineered to reach two targets at once — the GLP-1 target and the amylin target. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin, slows gastric emptying and signals fullness by a route GLP-1 does not use, so pairing the two actions aims to add effect without pushing GLP-1 dosing higher.
No. It is an investigational compound in early-phase development and is not approved anywhere. The study was funded by Novo Nordisk.
The most common were gastrointestinal, mostly mild to moderate, and the majority resolved by the end of the study. A large number of participants withdrew, though the paper notes a high proportion of those withdrawals were for reasons unrelated to adverse events.

References

  1. 1.Dahl K, Toubro S, Dey S, et al. Amycretin, a novel, unimolecular GLP-1 and amylin receptor agonist administered subcutaneously: results from a phase 1b/2a randomised controlled study The Lancet. 2025. PMID: 40550231.

Bone Density on a GLP-1: The Trial That Compared It Against Exercise

A four-arm randomized trial found liraglutide alone lost hip and spine bone density relative to exercise — while the combination arm lost the most weight and held bone density level with placebo.

7 min read

Danuglipron: The Oral GLP-1 That Worked, and That 6 in 10 Did Not Finish

Danuglipron's phase 2b study in 628 adults with obesity produced up to 12.9% weight loss against placebo — and 39.3% of participants completed treatment, with about 38% stopping for adverse events.

5 min read

Dry Mouth on a GLP-1: Three Published Cases, and What to Tell Your Dentist

The published evidence that GLP-1 drugs cause dry mouth is three case reports. Nobody has measured how often it happens — but reduced saliva raises decay risk regardless of cause, which is the part worth acting on.

5 min read

Eating Too Little on a GLP-1: What the Deficiency Data Show

Across 480,825 adults, more than 60% were consuming below estimated requirements, vitamin D deficiency reached 13.6% at a year, and ferritin ran 26–30% below an active comparator.

7 min read

GLP-1 Drugs After 65: Strength, Not Just Weight

Grip strength held up in general adult trials even as lean mass fell. In older adults with type 2 diabetes, prolonged use has been linked to the opposite — and no guidelines exist for this age group.

7 min read

GLP-1 Drugs After Menopause: The Group Taking Them Most, Studied Least

One review exists on GLP-1 drugs in peri- and postmenopausal women, and it opens by describing a paucity of data. Here is what has to be borrowed from other populations, and which borrowings hold up.

8 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

6.4

Direct Meds

Compounded semaglutide at $249/month

7.5

MEDGm

Month-to-month compounded semaglutide at $179 with the partner pharmacies named

5.7

HumeCare+

An oral route if you will not self-inject