Data investigation

What 186 FDA Warning Letters Say About This Market

Two letters in 2023, ten in 2024, 109 in 2025. The commonest subject is unlawful sale to consumers — enforcement here is overwhelmingly about what sellers said, not what pharmacies made.

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed
6 min read·1 citations

We keep a register of FDA warning letters relevant to this market, currently 186 of them. Read by year, it describes a regulator that went from occasional interest to sustained enforcement in about eighteen months: two letters in 2023, ten in 2024, 109 in 2025, and 65 so far in 2026 with the year not finished.

What the letters are about

Commonest subjects across 186 letters in our enforcement register.
SubjectLetters
Unlawful sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs to US consumers87
False and misleading claims / misbranded34
False and misleading claims / misbranded (telehealth)24
Compounded GLP-1 marketing and labeling concerns17
Compounding pharmacy / adulterated drug products8

The distribution is the interesting part. The single commonest category is selling — unlawful sale of unapproved and misbranded drugs to consumers — not manufacturing failure. Add the two misbranding categories and the marketing one, and the overwhelming majority of enforcement in this market is about what sellers said rather than what pharmacies made.

Eight letters concern adulterated drug products. A hundred and forty-five concern selling and saying.

That matches what we find reading seller sites all day, and it is worth knowing as a buyer: the failure mode this market is actually being disciplined for is claims, not contamination. Our articles on checking a review score and what a badge tells you cover the consumer end of the same problem.

How many of them are sellers you could buy from

Fifty-two of the 186 letters map to a seller in our register, and 54 seller reviews carry a letter flag. That is roughly one in ten of the sellers we track — a meaningful minority rather than a fringe.

A letter discloses a problem. It does not disqualify a seller. This is a standing rule here and it matters: a warning letter is the FDA telling a company to fix something, not a finding that its product harmed anyone, and companies do fix things. What a letter gives you is a specific, dated, official account of what the agency objected to — which is far more useful than a rating. Read what it alleges, then decide.

An error of our own, in the same data

While assembling these figures we found that four of our own seller reviews were stating “4”, “5” and “6 FDA warning letters matched to this operator” — and that none of those four companies had a single letter in the register.

The cause was mundane and the consequence was not. The field holding letters had also been used, historically, to store general FDA-related notes — boilerplate along the lines of “compounded semaglutide is not FDA-approved and has not been evaluated by FDA”, which is true of every compounded product and is not a letter. The page counted the length of that list. Four named businesses were publicly credited with enforcement history they do not have.

It is corrected, an automated check now fails our build if a letter count is ever built from anything other than a letter, and we confirmed the fix did not create the opposite error — those four are now told they have no letter, which is true of them in the register. We are describing it here because an article about other people’s enforcement records that quietly omitted our own mistake would not be worth publishing.

How to read a letter if your seller has one

  1. Check the date. A 2023 letter about claims that have since changed is a different thing from one issued last quarter.
  2. Read the subject line. “Adulterated drug products” and “false and misleading claims” are not the same order of concern.
  3. Check who it was addressed to. Letters go to legal entities, which frequently operate several consumer brands — see who actually runs your brand.
  4. Look for what changed afterward. The point of a warning letter is compliance, and the useful question is whether the company complied.
  5. Read it yourself. Every letter is published by the FDA, and our warning letters page links each one to its source.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

  1. 1.GLP Watchdog. FDA warning letter register — 186 letters relevant to GLP-1 selling and compounding, each linked to its FDA source; counts computed August 19, 2026 GLP Watchdog register. 2026. https://glpwatchdog.org/fda-warning-letters

BPC-157: What FDA Actually Said About It

Not approved, and not on the list a compounding pharmacy may use. FDA recorded specific concerns — immunogenicity, peptide impurities, and “no, or only limited, safety-related information”.

7 min read

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin: What FDA Recorded

Sold as a stack for fat loss. FDA identified serious adverse events with CJC-1295 — increased heart rate and systemic vasodilatory reaction — and neither peptide has a weight-loss trial.

7 min read

Is the Vial You Received What the Label Says?

FDA has found labels naming compounding pharmacies that do not exist, and labels naming real pharmacies that did not make the product. What to check when the box arrives, and what the 990 adverse event reports actually mean.

8 min read

What Cannot Legally Be Compounded — and Who Is Selling It Anyway

Federal law bars retatrutide and cagrilintide from compounding entirely. We checked our own 560-seller register against that rule, found 7 with it on the menu, and discovered our own reviews were not telling readers.

8 min read

What Makes a Telehealth GLP-1 Prescription Legitimate

The FDA publishes seven warning signs for telehealth medicine sellers, and almost nobody quotes them. Here they are, with what proper prescribing looks like and the one disclosure 139 of our 560 sellers fail.

7 min read

Who Actually Runs Your GLP-1 Brand

61 of the 560 sellers we track name one of just seven shared entities — one white-label platform, two prescriber networks, four compounding pharmacies. Comparing two brands can mean comparing two markups on the same vial.

7 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

7.9

Oak

Semaglutide at $119/month, 37% under the register median

6.5

Direct Meds

Compounded semaglutide at $249/month

7.7

Try Ageless

Semaglutide at $119/month, 37% under the register median