← All Top-N research lists

How Long Have These Drugs Actually Been Studied? 10 Papers (2026)

Last verified August 2026 · 10 papers · every citation checked against PubMed

By Ruth Calder · Enforcement Editor
Editorially reviewed & fact-checked against primary sources · How we verify contentLast reviewed

The pivotal obesity trials were built to last 68 to 72 weeks, which is long enough to win an approval and far short of the question people actually ask. Two things extend the record. First, the cardiovascular trials: they ran years longer, in tens of thousands of patients, collecting adverse events the whole time — LEADER at a median 3.8 years, REWIND at 5.4, SELECT at a mean 3.3 on the actual obesity dose. Second, three large database studies looking for events too rare for any trial to detect: serious gastrointestinal complications, suicidality, and the thyroid cancer that a rodent finding put in the boxed warning. ⚠ Two structural limits are worth stating up front. Long safety data mostly comes from people with type 2 diabetes, not from healthy adults taking these drugs for weight. And 5.4 years is the ceiling — for a drug someone may take for thirty, the honest answer past that point is that nobody knows yet.

Ranked papers

#1STEP-5

Two-year effects of semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 5 trial

Garvey WT, Batterham RL, Bhatta M, et al. · Nat Med · 2022

What it measured: Weight and side effects across two full years

The two-year randomized read on semaglutide 2.4 mg, extending the STEP-1 design to 104 weeks in 304 adults. Nothing new appeared in year two: gastrointestinal effects stayed dominant (82.2% against 53.9% on placebo), mild to moderate for the most part and clustered around dose escalation, with serious adverse events at 11.2% against 6.6%. ★ The useful finding is the absence of one — side effects did not accumulate with continued dosing, which is the premise chronic use rests on.

PMID 36216945NCT03693430

#2SELECT

Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes

Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. · N Engl J Med · 2023

What it measured: Cardiac events and serious side effects over an average of 3.3 years

The largest and longest safety dataset at the obesity dose: 17,604 adults followed a mean 39.8 months. Semaglutide produced fewer serious adverse events (33.4% against 36.4%), while twice as many people stopped over side effects (16.6% against 8.2%), almost entirely gastrointestinal. Gallstones were slightly more frequent (2.8% against 2.3%). No excess in pancreatitis, in thyroid cancer, or in psychiatric events. ★ Both halves matter: fewer serious problems, more people quitting.

PMID 37952131NCT03574597DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2307563

#3LEADER

Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. · N Engl J Med · 2016

What it measured: Cardiac events and reviewed side effects over a median 3.8 years

The reference safety dataset for the class, and the one FDA labeling still leans on: 9,340 patients on liraglutide over a median 3.8 years. Serious adverse events came out even (49.7% against 50.4%), gallstone disease was more common on the drug (3.1% against 1.9%), pancreatitis was numerically lower, and neither pancreatic cancer nor medullary thyroid carcinoma showed an excess. ⚠ It is a diabetes population at a diabetes dose — the closest thing to a long safety record in this class, and not a direct read on Wegovy.

PMID 27295427NCT01179048DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827

#4SUSTAIN-6

Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. · N Engl J Med · 2016

What it measured: Cardiac events and reviewed side effects over two years

The trial that produced the one long-term signal in this class that clinical practice actually changed for. Across 3,297 high-risk patients over 104 weeks, retinopathy complications ran 3.0% against 1.8% — a 76% relative increase — concentrated in patients who already had retinopathy and whose blood sugar dropped fast. ⚠ The mechanism is thought to be the speed of glycemic improvement rather than the drug itself, a phenomenon known from insulin. It is why eye screening before starting is now standard in patients with existing retinopathy.

PMID 27633186NCT01720446DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141

#5REWIND

Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND)

Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. · Lancet · 2019

What it measured: Cardiac events and reviewed side effects over a median 5.4 years

The longest randomized follow-up anywhere in the class: 9,901 patients on dulaglutide over a median 5.4 years, and the only long dataset drawn mostly from people who had not already had a cardiac event. Serious adverse events matched placebo at 45%, the three conditions that carry class warnings — pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, medullary thyroid carcinoma — came out balanced, and 6% stopped for gastrointestinal reasons. ★ Five and a half years is the current outer edge of randomized evidence for this drug class. Everything beyond it is observational.

PMID 31189511NCT01394952DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3

#6SURMOUNT-4

Continued Treatment With Tirzepatide for Maintenance of Weight Reduction in Adults With Obesity: The SURMOUNT-4 Randomized Clinical Trial

Aronne LJ, Sattar N, Horn DB, et al. · JAMA · 2024

What it measured: Weight and side effects over the year after dose escalation had finished

88 weeks of tirzepatide exposure in 670 adults — a 36-week open-label run-in followed by 52 weeks randomized to continue or switch to placebo. Continued dosing was well tolerated, with serious adverse events at 4.7% against 5.0%, and gastrointestinal effects were milder than in the original escalation phase because everyone had already titrated up. ⛔ The other half of the result is the reason it is quoted so often: stopping produced 14% weight regain over the year.

PMID 38078870NCT04660643DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.24945

#7STEP-1 extension

Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: The STEP 1 trial extension

Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M, et al. · Diabetes Obes Metab · 2022

What it measured: Weight, blood pressure, lipids and blood sugar a year after stopping

The paper that made 'indefinite' the default framing. 327 STEP-1 completers were followed for a year after everything stopped. Having lost 17.3%, they regained 11.6 percentage points of it — two-thirds — ending at 5.6% below where they started, with blood pressure, lipids, A1C and inflammatory markers drifting back toward baseline alongside. ★ No new adverse events appeared off the drug. Its significance is not a safety signal but a cost one: it is the evidence insurers are shown when the question is whether to cover treatment that never ends.

PMID 35441470NCT03548935

#8

Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss

Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, et al. · JAMA · 2023

What it measured: Rates of gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, bowel obstruction and stomach paralysis

The most-cited post-marketing safety signal, drawn from a claims database of roughly 16 million US patients and comparing semaglutide and liraglutide against a non-GLP-1 weight drug rather than against no treatment. Pancreatitis, bowel obstruction and gastroparesis were all substantially more frequent; biliary disease was not. ★ Two things are true at once — the relative increases are large and the absolute rates stay low. This analysis is what produced the 2023 label update adding ileus.

PMID 37796527DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.19574

#9WHO VigiBase replication

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and suicidality: A replication study using reports to the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database

McIntyre RS, Mansur RB, Rosenblat JD, et al. · J Affect Disord · 2025

What it measured: Whether suicidality reports stood out against other drugs in a global database

The check on the 2023 suicidality scare. After US adverse-event reports raised a signal, this analysis went looking for it in the World Health Organization's global database, comparing against other weight and diabetes drugs — and did not find it, with reporting ratios below 1 in most comparisons. ⚠ Spontaneous reports cannot establish a rate in either direction, so this is a failure to replicate rather than an exoneration. It is a substantial part of why European regulators concluded no causal link could be shown.

PMID 39433133

#10

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: An International Multisite Cohort Study

Baxter SM, Lund LC, Andersen JH, et al. · Thyroid · 2025

What it measured: Thyroid cancer rates against a comparable drug class, across four countries

The strongest evidence against the boxed warning. Danish, Norwegian and Swedish national registries plus a large US database, comparing more than 200,000 GLP-1 users against DPP-4 inhibitor users — a comparator chosen because it is prescribed to similar patients — over a mean 3.9 years. Thyroid cancer risk came out at 0.93, with a confidence interval running 0.66 to 1.31 and consistent results by drug and dose. ★ The warning originates in rodent toxicology. This is the best available human evidence that it does not carry across, and it is still not a randomized answer.

PMID 39772758

Related research lists

About this list

We curate ranked, citation-anchored PubMed paper lists for the most-searched questions in obesity medicine. Every citation on this page was checked against PubMed on 2026-08-16. Each paper card links directly to PubMed and to ClinicalTrials.gov where applicable.

Browse our full index of research lists or our long-form research articles.