Data investigation

Another Molecule You Cannot Buy

A dual agonist reported 14.7% weight loss in thirteen weeks. The drug is approved nowhere, and a thirteen-week figure sits on the steepest part of a curve that flattens.

By Nora Bissett · Pricing Editor
Editorially reviewed (not clinically reviewed). Not medical advice · How we verify contentLast reviewed
6 min read·1 citation

A phase 2 trial of VK2735, another dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist, reported 14.7% weight loss in thirteen weeks.[1] That is a faster rate than anything on the market has published, and it is about to be quoted without the second half of the sentence. The drug is not approved anywhere, and thirteen weeks is not a quarter of a year’s worth of a curve that flattens.

What the trial reported

VENTURE enrolled adults carrying excess weight who also had at least one condition tied to it, excluded anyone with diabetes, and assigned them weekly injections of VK2735 at one of several strengths or a placebo, for 13 weeks.

VENTURE at week 13. 140 participants across active doses, 34 on placebo.[1]
GroupWeight changePercent
VK2735 2.5 mg−9.2 kg−9.1%
VK2735 15 mg−14.6 kg−14.7%
Placebo−1.8 kg−1.7%

Across the active arms, 130 of 140 people — 93% — shed 5% or more. On placebo, 4 of 34 did. Adverse events were gastrointestinal, as expected, and became less frequent once the dose stopped climbing.

Why you cannot annualize this

Weight loss on these drugs is front-loaded. The curve is steepest in the first months and flattens as it goes — every long trial in this class shows the same shape. Multiplying a 13-week figure by four produces a number no trial has ever recorded in any drug. If you take 14.7% and project a year, you get 59%, which is not a real quantity.

The honest comparison is not against a 68- or 72-week result at all. It is against where the established drugs stood at their thirteenth week, and those figures are not reported alongside this one. A short trial can look extraordinary purely by being measured during the steep part of the curve.

That is not a criticism of the trial, which is a dose-ranging phase 2 doing exactly what a dose-ranging phase 2 should. It is a caution about the sentence that will circulate.

The endpoint the abstract does not report

The trial’s stated secondary endpoints include the proportion of participants losing at least 5% and the proportion losing at least 10%. The published abstract reports the first — 93% against 12% — and does not report the second.

The 10% threshold is the more informative of the two, because 5% is cleared by most people on any drug in this class and does not discriminate between them. We do not know what that figure was, we are not going to estimate it, and its absence from a summary that reports its companion is worth a reader’s attention.

For context on who is reporting: the paper carries a copyright line reading © 2026 Viking Therapeutics, Inc. — the company developing the drug. That is a normal arrangement for industry-sponsored publication and it is a fact a reader should have.

And it is not something you can be prescribed

VK2735 is in phase 2. It has no approval in any country, no label, no approved manufacturer, and no route to a pharmacy. What that means in practice is the same thing it meant for retatrutide: a promising early result raises demand that the legitimate supply chain cannot meet, and unlabeled vials appear online to fill the gap.

A phase 2 headline is the strongest marketing a gray-market seller will ever get for free.

The material used in this trial was manufactured to clinical-trial standard, at a verified concentration, with a known impurity profile. A powder sold under the same name has none of those properties verified, because there is no approved product to verify it against. The same reasoning, at greater length, is in retatrutide’s phase 3 and the gray market.

Frequently Asked Questions

In a 13-week phase 2 trial, 14.7% at the 15 mg dose and 9.1% at 2.5 mg, against 1.7% on placebo. Across the active arms, 93% shed 5% or more of their starting weight.
The trial does not answer that. It ran for 13 weeks, and weight loss in this class is front-loaded — the curve is steepest early and flattens. Comparing a 13-week result to a 68- or 72-week one measures the length of the trial as much as the drug.
No. Multiplying 14.7% over 13 weeks by four gives 59%, a figure no trial of any drug in this class has recorded. The curve does not continue at its early slope.
No. It is in phase 2 development, with no approval in any country, no label and no legal route to a pharmacy. Anything sold under that name online has no verified identity, purity or concentration.
The published abstract does not report it, although the proportion losing at least 10% is listed among the trial's secondary endpoints. Only the 5% threshold is given.

References

  1. 1.Bays HE, Toth P, Alkhouri N, et al. Weekly Subcutaneous VK2735, a GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Dual Agonist, for Weight Management: Phase 2, Randomized, 13-Week VENTURE Study Obesity. 2026. PMID: 41508550.

Retatrutide's Phase 3, and the Gray Market

A triple-receptor agonist cut HbA1c 1.94 points and weight 15.3% in a phase 3 trial. It is approved nowhere, and eleven sellers in our register are already shipping something by that name.

8 min read

Newer Is Not Stronger

Survodutide has a genuinely new mechanism and phase 3 results in the NEJM. It produced 13.0% weight loss at 76 weeks, and its higher dose caused gut side effects in nearly nine of ten participants while losing no more weight.

7 min read

The Drugs That Are Not Here Yet

Four investigational molecules have published human results. The most striking figure among them, 8% of body weight in four weeks, comes from the earliest and smallest study of the four.

8 min read

Survodutide: What the Phase 3 Evidence Shows

Survodutide, Boehringer Ingelheim's glucagon/GLP-1 dual agonist, cut weight 12.2% to 13.0% at 76 weeks in phase 3, less in type 2 diabetes. About one in five stopped over gut side effects. It is not approved and has no filing date.

9 min read

Cagrilintide: What the Evidence Shows, and Why You Can't Buy It

Cagrilintide, Novo Nordisk's amylin analog, produced 11.8% weight loss on its own at 68 weeks, less than semaglutide. It is not approved, cannot be compounded, and FDA has warned companies selling it.

9 min read

MariTide (Maridebart Cafraglutide): What the Evidence Shows

Amgen's monthly MariTide cut weight 12.3% to 16.2% at 52 weeks in phase 2, against 2.5% on placebo. It blocks GIP where tirzepatide activates it. Side effects, the MARITIME phase 3 trials, and why it cannot be bought yet.

10 min read

Where to get GLP-1 online, safely: sellers our editors have checked

These are telehealth sellers our editors have checked. For each one we hold a price, the form the drug comes in, and the states it reaches.

No insurance needed · vetted by our editors

Some of the links on this page earn us money. If you sign up with a provider after following one, that provider may pay GLP Watchdog a commission. Learn more

5.9

SkinnyRx

Starting below a standard dose, with microdose tiers

6.5

Sesame Care

Oral orforglipron alongside the injectables

8.4

Collective

Flat any-dose pricing, if you can absorb a $199 annual membership on top